Evidence and publications on cognitive stimulation: illustrative image with a REALICA headset
LUCIDA VR · Cognitive decline

Evidence and publications on cognitive stimulation

Distinguishing approaches and goals

Explore the pathwayProject in development · Pathways defined by the professional
01 / Cognitive stimulation

Distinguishing approaches and goals

Cognitive stimulation, training in specific skills and cognitive rehabilitation targeting functional goals are different approaches. Individual, group, immersive or non-immersive delivery also changes the context of the intervention. A recommendation for one of these approaches does not automatically demonstrate the efficacy of the others.

NICE guidelines recommend group cognitive stimulation for mild or moderate dementia and consider cognitive rehabilitation or occupational therapy to support functional ability. They distinguish these interventions from cognitive training, which they do not recommend as a treatment for mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease. These guidelines do not constitute a specific recommendation for LUCIDA VR. [12]

Studies, settings and critical appraisal
01

Virtual reality and MCI

The systematic review by Tortora and colleagues included three studies involving a total of 130 older participants with MCI, comparing VR-based cognitive rehabilitation with conventional interventions. The findings are promising, but heterogeneity, small samples and methodological concerns limit the strength of the conclusions and prevent claims of generalised superiority. [6]

02

Immersive research protocols

Perra and colleagues describe a randomised feasibility study protocol for an immersive programme in MCI. The paper defines an assessment methodology; it does not present conclusive efficacy results. [7]

Wong and colleagues present a randomised pilot protocol for immersive cognitive stimulation in people with MCI. Here too, goals and expected outcomes must be distinguished from results actually demonstrated. [8]

Cognitive stimulation

What this means for LUCIDA VR

These studies inform the research questions and assessment design. They do not validate the LUCIDA VR product or demonstrate prevention of dementia, slowing of neurodegeneration or lasting functional benefit.

The specific assessment must identify the intervention, population and comparator, include measures independent of the exercises and consider tolerability, everyday functioning and maintenance of any benefits. Improvement in the virtual task requires verification of transfer to real life.

Original sources

Reference
publications.

Open the studies and consult the full references.

06

Tortora and colleagues

Tortora C, Di Crosta A, La Malva P, et al. Virtual reality and cognitive rehabilitation for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2024;93:102146.

Source type: systematic review. Concerns other VR interventions, not LUCIDA VR.

Read the original source
07

Perra and colleagues

Perra A, Primavera D, Leonetti V, et al. Virtual reality cognitive remediation tool for individuals with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol for a feasibility randomized clinical trial. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1477279.

Source type: study protocol. Does not present efficacy results and does not concern LUCIDA VR.

Read the original source
08

Wong and colleagues

Wong WWS, Wong GHY, Choy JCP, Li DSP, Lo YL. Utilization of Immersive Virtual Reality in Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (IVR-CST) for elderly with mild cognitive impairment… PLoS One. 2025;20(8):e0330686.

Source type: randomised pilot protocol. Does not present efficacy results and does not concern LUCIDA VR.

Read the original source
11

National Institute on Aging

National Institute on Aging. Memory Problems, Forgetfulness, and Aging. Section on Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Use in the document: general background on MCI and its distinction from dementia.

Read the original source
12

NICE

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Dementia: assessment, management and support for people living with dementia and their carers. Guideline NG97. Recommendations 1.4.2, 1.4.4 and 1.4.5.

Use in the document: distinction between group cognitive stimulation, cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive training. Does not constitute approval or recommendation of LUCIDA VR.

Read the original source
The next topic

View the reference studies

View the reference studies
Continue exploring

In the same area

All topics
A stone arch opens onto a lake among mountains and vegetation

The first step is to talk.

Find out how to get started with REALICA VR.

Contact us
REALICA VR
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.